> Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better. > But I do not see any benefit in doing > > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1; > while (0 < (signed long)(timeout - jiffies)); On that bit we agree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.1 A.Sajjad Zaidi
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.... Petr Vandrovec
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running ... Alan Cox
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running ... A.Sajjad Zaidi
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.... Petr Vandrovec
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running ... Alan Cox
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems runn... Andre Hedrick
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems ... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running 2.4.... A.Sajjad Zaidi
- Re: Promise, DMA and RAID5 problems running ... Stephen Wille Padnos