On 30.07.2012 19:32, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hi > > Sorry for long delay > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:54:29PM +0200, Daniel Mack (zon...@gmail.com) > wrote: >> In the process of porting boards to devicetree implemenation, we should >> keep information about external circuitry where they belong - the >> individual drivers. >> >> This patch adds a way to specify a GPIO to drive the (optional) external >> pull-up logic, rather than using a function pointer for that. > > I do not object against this patch, but I have rather limited knowledge > about gpio driver.
The first patch just offers a new way to drive an optional external pull-up and as nobody uses that feature currently, there can't be any breakage. And the second patch doesn't change any functional behaviour of the driver, it simply offers a new way to instanciate it. > Patch looks good, feel free to add my > Acked-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <z...@ioremap.net> Thanks! > > Greg, please pull it into your tree, if Ville does not object. > Thank you. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
