On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 09:12 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> This adds support for appending to all UEFI variables, and also for
> deleting authentication variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjo...@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efivars.c | 99
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efivars.c b/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
> index 47408e8..b12a2f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efivars.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,27 @@ struct efi_variable {
> __u32 Attributes;
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> +struct win_certificate {
> + __u32 dwLength;
> + __u16 wRevision;
> + __u16 wCertificateType;
> + __u8 wCertificate[];
> +};
> +
> +struct win_certificate_uefi_guid {
> + struct win_certificate Hdr;
> + efi_guid_t CertType;
> +};
> +
> +struct efi_variable_authentication {
> + __u64 MonotonicCount;
> + struct win_certificate_uefi_guid AuthInfo;
> +};
> +
> +struct efi_variable_authentication_2 {
> + efi_time_t TimeStamp;
> + struct win_certificate_uefi_guid AuthInfo;
> +};
>
> struct efivar_entry {
> struct efivars *efivars;
> @@ -802,6 +823,54 @@ static struct pstore_info efi_pstore_info = {
> .erase = efi_pstore_erase,
> };
>
> +static int is_authenticated_delete(struct efi_variable *new_var)
> +{
> + /* If we get a set_variable() call that's got an authenticated
> + * variable attribute set, and its DataSize is the same size as
> + * the AuthInfo descriptor, then it's really a delete. */
Just FYI, the multi-line comment format used throughout this file is,
/*
* This is a multi-line comment
*/
and it would be better to not break that convention. Deleting entries in
this way seems counter-intuitive to me. Is there a reason that you can't
just delete authenticated variables with efivar_delete()?
> + if (new_var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS) {
> + struct efi_variable_authentication *eva;
> + __u32 size;
> +
> + if (new_var->DataSize <
> + sizeof(struct efi_variable_authentication))
> + return 0;
You could write this as,
if (new_var->DataSize < sizeof(*eva))
which would mean that you wouldn't have to split it across two lines
like this.
> + eva = (struct efi_variable_authentication *)new_var->Data;
> +
> + /* 27.2.4 says:
> + * dwLength: The length of the entire certificate, including
> + * the length of the header, in bytes.
> + */
> + size = sizeof(eva->AuthInfo.CertType) +
> + eva->AuthInfo.Hdr.dwLength;
> +
> + if (size == new_var->DataSize)
> + return 1;
> + } else if (new_var->Attributes
> + & EFI_VARIABLE_TIME_BASED_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS) {
> + struct efi_variable_authentication_2 *eva;
> + __u32 size;
> +
> + if (new_var->DataSize <
> + sizeof(struct efi_variable_authentication_2))
> + return 0;
> +
> + eva = (struct efi_variable_authentication_2 *)new_var->Data;
> +
> + /* 27.2.4 says:
> + * dwLength: The length of the entire certificate, including
> + * the length of the header, in bytes.
> + */
> + size = sizeof(eva->AuthInfo.CertType) +
> + eva->AuthInfo.Hdr.dwLength;
> +
> + if (size == new_var->DataSize)
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static ssize_t efivar_create(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
> char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
> @@ -812,6 +881,8 @@ static ssize_t efivar_create(struct file *filp, struct
> kobject *kobj,
> unsigned long strsize1, strsize2;
> efi_status_t status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
> int found = 0;
> + int is_append = 0;
> + int is_delete = 0;
>
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> return -EACCES;
> @@ -839,11 +910,20 @@ static ssize_t efivar_create(struct file *filp, struct
> kobject *kobj,
> break;
> }
> }
> - if (found) {
> + if (new_var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_APPEND_WRITE) {
> + if (!found) {
> + spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + is_append = 1;
> + } else if (is_authenticated_delete(new_var)) {
> + is_delete = 1;
> + } else if (found) {
> spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +
Stray newline introduced?
> /* now *really* create the variable via EFI */
> status = efivars->ops->set_variable(new_var->VariableName,
> &new_var->VendorGuid,
> @@ -857,16 +937,25 @@ static ssize_t efivar_create(struct file *filp, struct
> kobject *kobj,
> spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
> return -EIO;
> }
> - spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
>
> /* Create the entry in sysfs. Locking is not required here */
> - status = efivar_create_sysfs_entry(efivars,
> + if (is_delete) {
> + list_del(&search_efivar->list);
> +
> + /* We need to release this lock before unregistering. */
> + spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
> + efivar_unregister(search_efivar);
> + } else if (is_append) {
> + spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
> + } else {
> + spin_unlock(&efivars->lock);
> + status = efivar_create_sysfs_entry(efivars,
> utf16_strsize(new_var->VariableName,
> 1024),
> new_var->VariableName,
> &new_var->VendorGuid);
> - if (status) {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "efivars: variable created, but sysfs entry
> wasn't.\n");
> + if (status)
> + pr_warn("efivars: variable created, but sysfs entry
> wasn't.\n");
> }
> return count;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
