On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> wrote:
I think you need to CC DT bindings to devicetree-discuss. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt > index c855240..2a3d55c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt > @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ Required properties: > - reg: must be 0x4b for i2c address > - interrupts: twl6040 has one interrupt line connecteded to the main SoC > - interrupt-parent: The parent interrupt controller > +- gpio-controller: > +- #gpio-cells = <1>: twl6040 provides GPO lines. > - twl6040,audpwron-gpio: Power on GPIO line for the twl6040 > > - vio-supply: Regulator for the twl6040 VIO supply > @@ -29,6 +31,8 @@ Required properties: > - ti,viblmotor-res: Resistance parameter for left motor > - ti,viblmotor-res: Resistance parameter for right motor > > +- ti,use-gpo: Set it to <1> if the GPO functionality is in use > + It's not like I'm sort of expert on bindings, but I've seen the pattern status = "okay" used for this kind of boolean stuff, and if that node is not there it's implicitly not OK. Can someone shed some light on this convention? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
