On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 05:40:40 -0300, 
John R Lenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When trying to figure out how to get USB to work (it was the MPS
>setting, more in other post) I got a repeatable Oops (is it an
>oops? it doesn't say "Oops!" like I thought they do).

The kernel makes you guess what the error messages are, to add some
spice to life :-)

>Attached are two ksymoops outputs, for the two times I did this.

  Error (expand_objects): cannot 
stat(/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/usb/uhci.o) for uhci
  Error (expand_objects): cannot 
stat(/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/usb/usbcore.o) for usbcore
  Error (expand_objects): cannot 
stat(/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/input/mousedev.o) for mousedev
  Error (expand_objects): cannot 
stat(/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/input/input.o) for input
  Feb  4 04:32:20 burocracia kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual 
address d10ff9e8

ksymoops could not find the modules you loaded.  Did you rename, delete
or overwrite /lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1 between the oops and the time you
ran ksymoops?

  Error (expand_objects): cannot 
stat(/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/usb/uhci.o) for uhci
  Error (expand_objects): cannot 
stat(/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/usb/usbcore.o) for usbcore
  Warning (expand_objects): object 
/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/ppp_deflate.o for module ppp_deflate has 
changed since load
  Warning (expand_objects): object 
/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/bsd_comp.o for module bsd_comp has changed 
since load
  Warning (expand_objects): object 
/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/ppp_async.o for module ppp_async has 
changed since load
  Warning (expand_objects): object 
/lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/ppp_generic.o for module ppp_generic has 
changed since load
  Warning (expand_objects): object /lib/modules/2.4.2-pre1/kernel/drivers/net/slhc.o 
for module slhc has changed since load

ksymoops could could not find some modules, those it could find have
changed since the oops.  I would treat all your traces with suspicion,
the base data is very unreliable.  Try to reproduce with current
modules, instead of modules that have changed since the oops.

BTW, do not specify -O unless you have a good reason to ignore objects,
which you don't.  You should supply a system map with -m instead of
suppressing it with -M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to