Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:07:21PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Some of the other patches of this type made sense, but I'd personally >> prefer if this one was dropped, yes. Though I am just a nobody that >> reads patches rather than one of the relevant people. ;-) > > It's a valid point but I'm going to leave it in for now and see what the > general opinion is. Ok. To be more precise, this patch has two properties that other patches of the "make later patches easier to apply" class tend not to: * it introduces a significant functional change (adding tracepoints) * it would have been very easy to skip Have fun, and sorry for not explaining my reasoning before. Ciao, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
