Hi, On Thursday, July 19, 2012, Carsten Emde wrote: > Deepthi, > > >>> [..] > >>>> I could implement a sanitize mechanism of the ladder governor that > >>>> takes care the "disable" variables of all deeper states are set to 1, > >>>> if a state is disabled, and those of all lighter states are set to 0, > >>>> if a state is enabled. Do you wish me to do that? > >>> No, I dont think thats necessary, current code suffices it. > >>> The disable flag is knob we are giving to the user . So may be just > >>> document the intended use of disable flag working > >>> alongside design of ladder governor. > >> It's not necessary - but maybe better. Here comes v3 with a sanitizer. > >> Is this too ugly? > > The v2, with the documentation in place seems sufficient. > > Yup, this adds unnecessary fields which are not much use > > coz the same can be achieved with just disable flag check. > ok, let's take v2. > > > Also, any reason why the patch is being sent as an attachment ? > > Sending patches as an attachment is not a recommended practice. > Sorry.
Can you please resend the version regarded as the current one? And please send it inline this time. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
