On Thursday 19 July 2012, Tony Prisk wrote:
> Given that there have been no replies to this thread, and the restart patch
> has
> now been accepted using 'wmt' as the vendor namespace - would it be safe to
> assume we should formalize this in the vendor-bindings.txt?
>
> I'd like to try and have basic device tree support added for the next merge
> window (or this one if it all goes well :) ), but it relies on the vendor
> binding being
> formalized.
What about devices that come from via though? Anything that first showed up
in vt8500 or earlier should probably get a prefix identifying VIA rather
than WonderMedia.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
