Hi, Venu. 2012/7/18 Venu Byravarasu <vbyravar...@nvidia.com>: > Yes, you are right. > it was a mistake. > Will send a patch soon.
I saw your patch about this from https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/18/232 because i doesn't subcribe linux-kernel ML yet. The tps65090 mfd driver has two mfd_cells for "tps65090-pmic" and "tps65090-regulator". I can find tps65090-regulator driver but cannot find tps65090-pmic driver. Is there any reason to exist two mfd_cells? And one more question. struct tps65090_platform_data { int irq_base; int num_subdevs; struct tps65090_subdev_info *subdevs; } This is platform data struct for tps65090 mfd driver, but num_subdevs and subdevs are not used in the mfd driver. How do you handle platform data of tps65090 mfd driver and regulator driver? Thanks. > > Thanks, > Venu > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofm...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 6:14 PM >> To: Venu Byravarasu >> Cc: sa...@linux.intel.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Question about tps65090 mfd driver >> >> Hi, >> >> I have one question about tps65090 mfd driver. >> There are following codes in the drivers/mfd/tps65090.c >> >> ... >> static struct mfd_cell tps65090s[] = { >> { >> .name = "tps65910-pmic", >> }, >> { >> .name = "tps65910-regulator", >> }, >> }; >> ... >> >> I know tps65090 and tps65910 have each different regulator driver. >> >> drivers/regulator/tps65090-regulator.c >> drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c >> >> So, i wonder whether it is right that tps65090 mfd driver has tps65910-xxx. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> - Joonyoung Shim -- - Joonyoung Shim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
