Re: [reiserfs-list] ReiserFS Oops (2.4.1, deterministic, symlink related)

[Alan Cox]

> administrator that has worked in large multi hundred million dollar compani=
> es where 1 hour of downtime =3D=3D $75,000 in lost income proactive prevent=
> ion IS the right answer. If the gcc people need to compile with the .96 rh =
> version then they can apply a removal patch hans provides in the crash mess=
> age. This makes it easy to remove the safeguard and blow yourself up at wil=
> l after being suitibly called a dumbass.

With all due respect, if you are running $75,000/hr of lost income (which btw
is small fry to a lot of folks) shouldn't you have an engineering team who
a) read the documentation. 
b) run tests before rolling out software

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/