On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:05 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > The existing mechanism of reserving PEBs for bad PEB handling has two > flaws: > - It is calculated as a percentage of good PEBs instead of total PEBs. > - There's no limit on the amount of PEBs UBI reserves for future bad > eraseblock handling.
Thanks Shmulik - I did not have time to look at the patches, but the overall description looks good. I will review the patches as soon as I can. Thanks for making sense of this mess. But one more think is the mtd web-site. I've grepped for '1%' and there are plenty of them. I've changed them all to 2% more or less mechanically - only cleaned up one section by removing out-of-date information. Would you please grep for '2%' and review if the information there is reasonable? Also, would you please add some more info to this FAQ entry: http://linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html#L_bad_blocks_exceeded Or even better if you could write a separate section for this stuff in the documentation, then you could remove that FAQ entry completely. Thanks a lot! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
