On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM, David Rientjes <rient...@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
>> index 12637ce..aa3ca5b 100644
>> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
>> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
>> @@ -98,7 +98,9 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(const char *name,
>> size_t size, size_t align
>>
>> s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>> oops:
>> +#endif
>> mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex);
>> put_online_cpus();
>>
>
> Tip: gcc allows label attributes so you could actually do
>
> oops: __maybe_unused
>
> to silence the warning and do the same for the "out" label later in the
> function.
I'm not exactly loving that either.
It'd probably be better to reshuffle the code so that the debug checks
end up in separate functions that are no-op for !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. That
way the _labels_ are used unconditionally although there's no actual
code generated.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
