On 07/12/2012 01:55 PM, Piotr Sawuk wrote:

> hello! I haven't done any kernel-hacking before, so be patient.
> 
> I got as far as to make tcphealth run, but now I need some help:
> how does read-locking work in the tcp_sock struct?
> the original code (for 2.5.1) made a read_lock(&head->lock) with
> struct tcp_ehash_bucket *head = &tcp_ehash[i];
> at the beginning of the for-loop over all sk=head->chain.
> i.e.
>        for (i=0; i < tcp_ehash_size; i++) {
>                struct tcp_ehash_bucket *head = &tcp_ehash[i];
>                struct sock *sk;
>                struct tcp_opt *tp;
> 
>                read_lock(&head->lock);
>                for (sk=head->chain; sk; sk=sk->next) {
>                        if (!TCP_INET_FAMILY(sk->family))
>                                continue;
> 
> and in the new kernel this construction has been replaced by
> 
>         if (st->state==TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED)
> ...
> static struct tcp_seq_afinfo tcphealth_seq_afinfo
> ...
> 
> and the example with proc/net/tcp is seemingly not locking anything. do I
> actually need a read-lock for diagnostic data from tcp_sock? why did the
> original author need to lock the whole chain of tcp_sock?
> 
> here's my patch against 3.4.4 so far, any further comments welcome:


Along with what Mr. Hemminger said:

Don't make patches to a stable kernel version.  Just make them
to mainline (e.g., 3.5-rc6).

More comments below.


> 
> diff -rub linux-3.4.4/include/linux/tcp.h
> linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/include/linux/tcp.h
> --- linux-3.4.4/include/linux/tcp.h   2012-06-22 20:37:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/include/linux/tcp.h  2012-07-06 10:23:13.000000000
> +0200



See the 2 lines above.  They should be all on one line (the +0200 is
on a separate line).  Something along the way split this long line for
you, but this is bad.  It corrupts the patch.


> @@ -472,6 +474,15 @@
>        * contains related tcp_cookie_transactions fields.
>        */
>       struct tcp_cookie_values  *cookie_values;
> +
> +     /*
> +      * TCP health monitoring counters.
> +      */
> +     __u32   dup_acks_sent;
> +     __u32   dup_pkts_recv;
> +     __u32   acks_sent;
> +     __u32   pkts_recv;
> +             __u32   last_ack_sent;  /* Sequence number of the last ack we 
> sent.


Extra tab before __u32 above.

 */
>  };
> 
>  static inline struct tcp_sock *tcp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
> diff -rub linux-3.4.4/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> --- linux-3.4.4/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c  2012-06-22 20:37:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c 2012-07-06
> 10:12:12.000000000 +0200


Bad line(s) above.

> @@ -5375,6 +5382,14 @@
> 
>       tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp = 0;
> 
> +     /*
> +      *      Tcp health monitoring is interested in
> +      *      total per-connection packet arrivals.
> +      *      This is in the fast path, but is quick.
> +      */
> +


The     */
is enough white space; don't add an extra line.

> +     tp->pkts_recv++;
> +
>       /*      pred_flags is 0xS?10 << 16 + snd_wnd
>        *      if header_prediction is to be made
>        *      'S' will always be tp->tcp_header_len >> 2
> diff -rub linux-3.4.4/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
> --- linux-3.4.4/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c   2012-06-22 20:37:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c  2012-07-11 09:34:22.000000000
> +0200
> @@ -2533,6 +2533,82 @@
>       return 0;
>  }
> 
> +
> +/*
> + *   Output /proc/net/tcphealth
> + */
> +#define LINESZ 128
> +
> +int tcp_health_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> +{
> +     int len, num;
> +       char srcIP[32], destIP[32];


Use tab above for indentation (don't use spaces).

> +
> +     unsigned long  SmoothedRttEstimate,
> +             AcksSent, DupAcksSent, PktsRecv, DupPktsRecv;
> +     struct tcp_iter_state *st;
> +
> +     if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
> +             seq_printf(seq,
> +             "TCP Health Monitoring (established connections only)\n"
> +             " -Duplicate ACKs indicate lost or reordered packets on the 
> connection.\n"
> +             " -Duplicate Packets Received signal a slow and badly 
> inefficient
> connection.\n"
> +             " -RttEst estimates how long future packets will take on a 
> round trip
> over the connection.\n"
> +             "id   Local Address        Remote Address       RttEst(ms) 
> AcksSent "
> +             "DupAcksSent PktsRecv DupPktsRecv\n");
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Loop through established TCP connections */
> +     st = seq->private;
> +
> +
> +     if (st->state==TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED)
> +     {


Kernel style is:

        if (st->state == TCP_SEQ_STATE_ESTABLISHED) {


> +/*   ; //insert read-lock here */
> +             const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(v);
> +             const struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(v);
> +             __be32 dest = inet->inet_daddr;
> +             __be32 src = inet->inet_rcv_saddr;
> +             __u16 destp = ntohs(inet->inet_dport);
> +             __u16 srcp = ntohs(inet->inet_sport);
> +
> +             num=st->num;


                num = st->num;

> +             SmoothedRttEstimate = (tp->srtt >> 3);
> +             AcksSent = tp->acks_sent;
> +             DupAcksSent = tp->dup_acks_sent;
> +             PktsRecv = tp->pkts_recv;
> +             DupPktsRecv = tp->dup_pkts_recv;
> +
> +             sprintf(srcIP, "%lu.%lu.%lu.%lu:%u",
> +                     ((src >> 24) & 0xFF), ((src >> 16) & 0xFF), ((src >> 8) 
> & 0xFF), (src
> & 0xFF),
> +                     srcp);
> +             sprintf(destIP, "%3d.%3d.%3d.%3d:%u",
> +                     ((dest >> 24) & 0xFF), ((dest >> 16) & 0xFF), ((dest >> 
> 8) & 0xFF),
> (dest & 0xFF),
> +                     destp);
> +
> +             seq_printf(seq, "%d: %-21s %-21s "
> +                             "%8lu %8lu %8lu %8lu %8lu%n",
> +                             num,
> +                             srcIP,
> +                             destIP,
> +                             SmoothedRttEstimate,
> +                             AcksSent,
> +                             DupAcksSent,
> +                             PktsRecv,
> +                             DupPktsRecv,
> +
> +                             &len
> +                     );
> +
> +             seq_printf(seq, "%*s\n", LINESZ - 1 - len, "");
> +/*   ; //insert read-unlock here */
> +     }
> +
> +out:
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct file_operations tcp_afinfo_seq_fops = {
>       .owner   = THIS_MODULE,
>       .open    = tcp_seq_open,
> @@ -2541,6 +2617,15 @@
>       .release = seq_release_net
>  };
> 
> +static struct tcp_seq_afinfo tcphealth_seq_afinfo = {
> +     .name           = "tcphealth",
> +     .family         = AF_INET,
> +     .seq_fops       = &tcp_afinfo_seq_fops,
> +     .seq_ops        = {
> +             .show           = tcp_health_seq_show,
> +     },
> +};
> +
>  static struct tcp_seq_afinfo tcp4_seq_afinfo = {
>       .name           = "tcp",
>       .family         = AF_INET,
> @@ -2552,12 +2637,15 @@
> 
>  static int __net_init tcp4_proc_init_net(struct net *net)
>  {
> -     return tcp_proc_register(net, &tcp4_seq_afinfo);
> +     int ret=tcp_proc_register(net, &tcp4_seq_afinfo);


        int ret = tcp_proc_register(...);

> +     if(ret==0) ret=tcp_proc_register(net, &tcphealth_seq_afinfo);


        if (ret == 0)
                ret = tcp_proc_register(...);

> +     return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static void __net_exit tcp4_proc_exit_net(struct net *net)
>  {
>       tcp_proc_unregister(net, &tcp4_seq_afinfo);
> +     tcp_proc_unregister(net, &tcphealth_seq_afinfo);
>  }
> 
>  static struct pernet_operations tcp4_net_ops = {
> diff -rub linux-3.4.4/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> --- linux-3.4.4/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c 2012-06-22 20:37:50.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-3.4.4-heal-lsm/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c        2012-07-06
> 17:15:14.000000000 +0200


Bad split lines above.

> @@ -2754,8 +2755,15 @@
>       skb_reserve(buff, MAX_TCP_HEADER);
>       tcp_init_nondata_skb(buff, tcp_acceptable_seq(sk), TCPHDR_ACK);
> 
> +             /* If the rcv_nxt has not advanced since sending our last ACK, 
> this is
> a duplicate. */
> +             if (tcp_sk(sk)->rcv_nxt == tcp_sk(sk)->last_ack_sent)
> +                     tcp_sk(sk)->dup_acks_sent++;
> +             /* Record the total number of acks sent on this connection. */
> +             tcp_sk(sk)->acks_sent++;
> +
>       /* Send it off, this clears delayed acks for us. */
>       TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->when = tcp_time_stamp;
> +             tcp_sk(sk)->last_ack_sent = tcp_sk(sk)->rcv_nxt;


Extra tab indentation above.

>       tcp_transmit_skb(sk, buff, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  }
> 
> 
> --


-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to