On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 01:12:54 +0200, Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:35:14 +0200, Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com> wrote:
+#define        RB_RED          0
+#define        RB_BLACK        1

Interestingly, those are almost never used. RB_BLACK is used only once.
Should we get rid of those instead?  Or change the code (like rb_is_red())
to use them?

I'm actually making heavier use of RB_RED / RB_BLACK later on in the patch set.

Yeah, I've just noticed.  Disregard my comment.

But agree, rb_is_red() / rb_is_black() could use these too.

--
Best regards,                                         _     _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: m...@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to