On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:38:19PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 16:36 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > In this case he can just record sched wakeup as well. With sched_switch
> > + sched_wakeup, he'll unlikely lose events.
> >
> > With sched_stat_sleep he will lose events, unless we fix this period
> > demux thing.
>
> But without this patch, the sched_wakeup will belong to another task, so
> if you trace task A, and B wakes you, you'll never see the wakeup.
Ah so the goal is to minimize the amount of events by only tracing task A?
Ok then. Still we need to fix these events that use __perf_count() because
wide tracing of sched_switch/wake_up still generate less events than
sched stat sleep.
I believe:
perf record -e sched:sched_stat_sleep sleep 1
produces 1 billion events because we sleep 1 billion nanosecs. Or
something like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
