From: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Commit a0375156 properly notes that superblock doesn't need to be marked
as dirty when only number of free inodes / blocks / number of directories
changes since that is recomputed on each mount anyway. However that comment
leaves some unnecessary markings as dirty in place. Remove these.
Artem: tested using xfstests for both journalled and non-journalled ext4.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityuts...@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityuts...@linux.intel.com>
---
fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 2 --
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index d48e8b1..25b918c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -315,7 +315,6 @@ out:
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
if (!fatal)
fatal = err;
- ext4_mark_super_dirty(sb);
} else
ext4_error(sb, "bit already cleared for inode %lu", ino);
@@ -830,7 +829,6 @@ got:
percpu_counter_dec(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
if (S_ISDIR(mode))
percpu_counter_inc(&sbi->s_dirs_counter);
- ext4_mark_super_dirty(sb);
if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, group);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 1cd6994..eabfb4c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2825,7 +2825,6 @@ ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used(struct
ext4_allocation_context *ac,
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, gdp_bh);
out_err:
- ext4_mark_super_dirty(sb);
brelse(bitmap_bh);
return err;
}
@@ -4694,7 +4693,6 @@ do_more:
put_bh(bitmap_bh);
goto do_more;
}
- ext4_mark_super_dirty(sb);
error_return:
brelse(bitmap_bh);
ext4_std_error(sb, err);
--
1.7.7.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
