On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:17:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:43:29PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 09:33:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 02:00:18PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > > > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ config X86 > > > > select KTIME_SCALAR if X86_32 > > > > select GENERIC_STRNCPY_FROM_USER > > > > select GENERIC_STRNLEN_USER > > > > + select HAVE_RCU_USER_QS if X86_64 > > > > > > And I will bite yet again. Why only 64-bit kernels? > > > > Because HAVE_RCU_USER_QS requires an architecture-specific component, > > and this patch series only added the necessary bits to entry_64.S. > > OK, please allow me to rephrase the question. Why only entry_64.S? ;-)
So like I said, I prefer to wait for reviews and general opinion before pushing further. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
