On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:51:53PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Does this fix the ramfs problem in -ac ?
>
> --- fs/ramfs/inode.c~ Wed Jan 31 22:02:16 2001
> +++ fs/ramfs/inode.c Fri Feb 2 14:51:47 2001
> @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@
> inode->i_blocks += IBLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
> rsb->free_pages--;
> SetPageDirty(page);
> - UnlockPage(page);
> } else {
> ClearPageUptodate(page);
> ret = 0;
> @@ -264,6 +263,7 @@
>
> if (! ramfs_alloc_page(inode, page))
> return -ENOSPC;
> + UnlockPage(page);
> return 0;
> }
No, so have to unlock it also, if you return -ENOSPC.
So the correct fix seems to be:
--- linux/fs/ramfs/inode.c~ Wed Jan 31 22:02:16 2001
+++ linux/fs/ramfs/inode.c Fri Feb 2 14:51:47 2001
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@
inode->i_blocks += IBLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
rsb->free_pages--;
SetPageDirty(page);
- UnlockPage(page);
} else {
ClearPageUptodate(page);
ret = 0;
@@ -264,6 +263,9 @@
- if (! ramfs_alloc_page(inode, page))
+ if (! ramfs_alloc_page(inode, page)) {
+ UnlockPage(page);
return -ENOSPC;
+ }
+ UnlockPage(page);
return 0;
}
This currently works for me (but using 2.4.0 + dwg-ramfs.patch + this patch)
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
