On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Once charged, swapcache pages can only be uncharged after they are
> removed from swapcache again.
> 
> Do not try to uncharge pages that are known to be in the swapcache, to
> allow future patches to remove checks for that in the uncharge code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <han...@cmpxchg.org>
> ---
>  mm/shmem.c |   11 ++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
> index ee1c5a2..d12b705 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -302,8 +302,6 @@ static int shmem_add_to_page_cache(struct page *page,
>               if (!expected)
>                       radix_tree_preload_end();
>       }
> -     if (error)
> -             mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
>       return error;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1184,11 +1182,14 @@ static int shmem_getpage_gfp(struct inode *inode, 
> pgoff_t index,
>               __set_page_locked(page);
>               error = mem_cgroup_cache_charge(page, current->mm,
>                                               gfp & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK);
> -             if (!error)
> -                     error = shmem_add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, index,
> -                                             gfp, NULL);
>               if (error)
>                       goto decused;
> +             error = shmem_add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, index,
> +                                             gfp, NULL);
> +             if (error) {
> +                     mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
> +                     goto decused;
> +             }
>               lru_cache_add_anon(page);
>  
>               spin_lock(&info->lock);
> -- 

I wanted to try this series out on mmotm before replying, and that
took a while; but the problems (some experimental RCU stuff, since
reverted; and Michal's wait_on_page_writeback in vmscan.c, I'll have
to investigate that later) were in mmotm rather than your series:
seems to be running fine under load now.

I've not reviewed, but definitely approve avoiding the temporary
extra charge in migration, and your other simplifications.

And I do approve this change, but selfishly withhold my Ack because
it's a subset of small shmem.c changes I was already lining up to
post, hoping still to sneak into 3.5.  We have a real bug in there
(charging to wrong memcg), and this cleanup comes along with that.
I'll post my version in an hour or two.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to