From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung....@lge.com>
It seems there's no specific reason to open-code it. I guess the
commit 0122ec5b02f76 ("sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock()")
simply missed it. Let's be consistent with others.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3987b9ddc563..1327f4de2054 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4343,9 +4343,7 @@ recheck:
*/
if (unlikely(policy == p->policy && (!rt_policy(policy) ||
param->sched_priority == p->rt_priority))) {
-
- __task_rq_unlock(rq);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+ task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
