On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:01:12PM -0400, Eric Wustrow wrote:
> Will this do the long path in add_interrupt_randomness every 16 interrupts
> instead of 128?
Yes, but given that benchmarks didn't show any performance degradation
even under a worst case scenario (i.e., no interrupt mitigation, and a
crazy number of interrupts/second), I decided to leave things as they
are.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
