On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > Neither of which seem like acceptable solutions for a 2.6.23 -> 2.6.24
> > _regression_. Or maybe I am just too naive to believe Linus' statement
> > on not letting the kernel regress...
>
> So, please sign-off the patch that we have, if you think it's right
> and doesn't cause more regressions.
I did look at the patch and can gladly add a:
Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
But this seems backwards. It was _your_ commit that broke the setup and
the patch touches a driver _you're_ maintaining.
So can we just revert commit 753f492093da7a40141bfe083073400f518f4c68
("[B44]: port to native ssb support") from 2.6.24 and you can add it back
to 2.6.25 if the problem indeed does go away?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
