On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Dan, > > >> > > >> What's going on with the dma engine drivers for 2.6.25? We had a > > >> Freescale dma driver from Zhang Wei queued up but seems to have been > > >> lost. > > > > > > I pulled it into my tree and am holding it until Zhang has an > > > opportunity to address the pending review comments [1]. I also did > > > not feel comfortable pushing it to Linus without a PPC maintainer's > > > Acked-by/Reviewed-by. > > > > > > I have attached the version I am carrying. > > > > What issues are still open. I was under the belief that Zhang had > > resolved all the issues. > > > > The high priority review item is that the driver performs operation > completion callbacks in hardirq context. Clients of the API assume > that callbacks will happen in softirq context. Of lesser concern is > the use of GFP_ATOMIC in fsl_dma_alloc_descriptor. Other drivers > preallocate a small pool of descriptors. >
Have not received a response, so let's try this the other way. I took a closer look and found that my concern should be addressed by the following one-liner: diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c index 902e852..cc9a681 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c @@ -685,7 +685,6 @@ static irqreturn_t fsl_dma_chan_do_interrupt(int irq, void *data) "nlndar 0x%016llx\n", (u64)get_cdar(fsl_chan), (u64)get_ndar(fsl_chan)); stat &= ~FSL_DMA_SR_EOSI; - fsl_chan_ld_cleanup(fsl_chan); } /* If it current transfer is the end-of-transfer, With your ack I'll push the driver plus this fixlet for the current kernel. Regards, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/