On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:56:14PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 22 February 2008 18:51:32 Gabriel C wrote: > > > I'm not going to play these kconfig SELECT tricks anymore. > > > > Fix it different then. > > Please do so. > > > Yes it is but that is still not a valid reason to NACK that patch , I'm > > sorry. > > NACK means I (being the maintainer of the modified code) won't > sign-off this patch. Nothing more or less. If some upstream maintainer > decides to bypass me and apply the patch nevertheless is not of > my business. But I will not sign-off or ack this patch.
As the maintainer will not accept this, I'm not going to take it for the -stable tree either, sorry. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
