On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>  > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>
> > > I don't really have any idea. Nothing has been changed in this area for a
>  > > couple of years. The command TX timeout is the timeout that indicates a
>  > > missing answer to a command sent down to the Bluetooth chip.
>  > >
>  > > However this involves some atomic and tasklet stuff. Did we have some 
> changes
>  > > that I missed and might now render this usage as broken.
>  >
>  > Not that I'm aware off, but this might as well be some old use after
>  > free bug which got exposed by some unrelated change. The good news is
>  > that it is reproducible. I'll hack up some nasty debug patch which
>  > lets us - hopefully - decode where the timer was armed.
>
>  Quel, before I do that, is there any chance that you retest with the
>  latest mainline git version ?
>
>  
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.25-rc2-git4.bz2

And please test with this patch as well:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/20/121

>
>  Is the delta which applies on top of rc2.
>
>
>
>  Thanks,
>
>         tglx
>  --
>  To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>  the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>  Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to