Hi Andy, On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0000 Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As devout believers in testing things early we test -mm and -git releases > as they drop. I am keen that we are able to continue this with the -next > tree once it gets going. Having just pulled this tree its not obvious how > I would communicate which tree I had tested. I guess we could use the > SHA1 of the actual head used, but that really is cumbersome for the poor > people who have to check the results and actually report things to lkml.
I hope I have addressed this issue by tagging each tree with its date i.e. todays was next-20080220. > Also will you be producing any tarballs for these releases? If so I > would say they would definatly need to be against some common base, like > against the nearest official tag "below". I hadn't considered tarballs, but I will give it some thought. Thanks for your thoughts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpKI7lgRaxix.pgp
Description: PGP signature
