On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:54:22 +1100 (EST),
Neale Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If this is a correct and justifiable fix for 2.2 then in 2.4 should
>dmi_scan.o be included in export-objs? Or is there a "better" way of
>doing this?
It should already be correct in 2.4. In 2.2 the OX_OBJS list is
independent from the O_OBJS list and OX_OBJS is linked first, causing
strange out of order problems. In 2.4 export-objs is a subset of the
object list and export-objs does not impose any link ordering.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
