On Feb 12 2008 01:09, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> On a different note, i noticed ide-scsi might also need a cleanup >> similar to the other drivers. It is next on my TODO list in case >> you don't have anything with a higher prio. > >I was actually hoping that you'll continue unifying ATAPI handling... > >[ ide-scsi is orphaned and has (probably) unfixable problems > (because of having dependencies on both IDE and SCSI subsystems) > so it is not worth IMO but I will of course accept patches... ]
So, why is ide-scsi still in the tree? Is there some use case besides cdrecord? (Which can use /dev/hda already without the ide-scsi blob...) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/