> So basically the "relative" nodemask that is passed with
> MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES is wrapped around the allowed nodes?
>
> relative nodemask mems_allowed result
> 1,3,5 4 4
> 1,3,5 4-6 4-6
> 1,3,5 4-8 4-5,7
> 1,3,5 4-10 4,6,8
>
> Is that correct?
By my calculation, all but the last line is correct.
We use zero-based numbering, so relative node '1' is the
'second' node, and the 'second' node in allowed nodes 4-10
is node 5, not 4. Similarly for relative nodes '3' and '5'.
So that last line should be:
> 1,3,5 4-10 5,7,9
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
