On Mon, 28 Sep 2026 11:11:50 +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > Why not combine it with the protection?
Will do. > Why not do that at the very top? Will do. > You can set that all already when initializing aboce Will do. > BTW, why do we fail the entire test here instead of only this test case? I did that because the test is about the bit after the move, not the move itself, so a failing move is closer to a setup failure. I thought it was better to stop there and let whoever runs it check their environment before running the rest. But having gone through the file's history, I see the direction has been to skip or fail just that one test and keep the rest running. I'll change it in v4. Thanks for the review! Donggeun
