Hi Dhaval,
How does this patch (on top of todays sched-devel.git) work for you?
It keeps my laptop nice and spiffy when I run
let i=0; while [ $i -lt 100 ]; do let i+=1; while :; do :; done & done
under a third user (nobody). This generates huge latencies for the nobody
user (up to 1.6s) but root and peter don't seem to get above 40ms
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/sched_fair.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -925,6 +925,7 @@ struct sched_entity {
u64 exec_start;
u64 sum_exec_runtime;
u64 vruntime;
+ u64 vperiod;
u64 prev_sum_exec_runtime;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -220,9 +220,11 @@ static inline u64 min_vruntime(u64 min_v
static inline s64 entity_key(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
- return se->vruntime - cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+ return se->vruntime + se->vperiod - cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
}
+static u64 sched_vslice_add(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);
+
/*
* Enqueue an entity into the rb-tree:
*/
@@ -240,6 +242,8 @@ static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_
if (se == cfs_rq->curr)
return;
+ se->vperiod = sched_vslice_add(cfs_rq, se);
+
cfs_rq = &rq_of(cfs_rq)->cfs;
link = &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline.rb_node;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
