On 9/13/26 11:24, Christian Loehle wrote: > On 8/26/26 15:56, Christian Loehle wrote: >> On 8/17/26 12:16, Christian Loehle wrote: >>> Syscall User Dispatch (SUD) is unavailable on architectures without >>> generic syscall entry. Such architectures return -EINVAL for otherwise >>> valid SUD prctl and ptrace requests, which the SUD selftests currently >>> report as failures. >>> >>> Probe SUD with a valid disabled configuration and skip the affected tests >>> when that probe returns EINVAL. Unexpected errors remain failures, and the >>> existing coverage is unchanged on kernels that support SUD. >>> >>> Christian Loehle (3): >>> selftests/ptrace: Skip get_set_sud if SUD is unsupported >>> selftests/syscall_user_dispatch: Skip tests if SUD is unsupported >>> selftests/syscall_user_dispatch: Skip benchmark if SUD is unsupported >>> >>> tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/get_set_sud.c | 8 +++++ >>> .../syscall_user_dispatch/sud_benchmark.c | 9 +++++ >>> .../syscall_user_dispatch/sud_test.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+) >>> >>> >>> base-commit: 8d3ae59288f1e7d58d76558a6ee96d533bc5019f >> >> Gentle ping on this > > Another gentle ping, this should have all the reviews to land, right?
Shuah, Thomas, Either of you mind picking this up in either kselftest or core/entry? Thanks! Christian
