Fix following sparse warnings by using __force attribute: sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:571:20: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:749:17: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:773:24: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:797:25: sparse: sparse: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in initializer (different address spaces) @@ expected void *rsc_offset @@ got void [noderef] __iomem * @@ drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: expected void *rsc_offset drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:837:49: sparse: got void [noderef] __iomem * Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <[email protected]> --- drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c index c685bb5fa62c..f9cdd3c024dc 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc, return -ENOMEM; /* Update memory entry va */ - mem->va = (void *)va; + mem->va = (__force void *)va; /* clear TCMs */ memset_io(va, 0, mem->len); @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static struct resource_table *zynqmp_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc *size = r5_core->rsc_tbl_size; - return (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; + return (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; } static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) return -EINVAL; } - rsc_data_va = (struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start, + rsc_data_va = (__force struct rsc_tbl_data *)ioremap_wc(res_mem.start, sizeof(struct rsc_tbl_data)); if (!rsc_data_va) { dev_err(dev, "failed to map resource table data address\n"); @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_get_rsc_table_va(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core) return -EINVAL; } - rsc_tbl_addr = (struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; + rsc_tbl_addr = (__force struct resource_table *)r5_core->rsc_tbl_va; /* * As of now resource table version 1 is expected. Don't fail to attach @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_handle_rsc(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc, int offset, int avail) { struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv; - void *rsc_offset = (r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset); + void *rsc_offset = (__force void *)(r5_core->rsc_tbl_va + offset); if (rsc_type != XLNX_RPROC_FW_CRASH_REPORT) return RSC_IGNORED; base-commit: d4d61a4b0a52e8f3cdb3e1578602850a3452ec3e -- 2.43.0
