On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:24:08PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyways the slight risk of the other CPUs eventually recovering would > > seem a acceptable trade off versus not being able to use the debugger > > to debug the system with hanging CPUs. > > see? There's the difference between us. The initial merge of KGDB does > not want to include policies for nuances that pose an "acceptable slight > risk".
Ok fine. Please implement DMA quiescence on kgdb entry then; otherwise the code won't conform to your standards at all. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
