From: Roland Dreier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:24:05 -0800
> I'm seeing a strange hang with current git (head 96b5a46e) on an ia64 > box -- an Intel SDV with 2 dual core hyperthreaded Itanium 2 CPUs (so > 8 logical CPUs to the kernel). It hangs without printing anything > ("Uncompressing Linux... done" from ELILO is the last thing I see) if > I have CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y; it works fine with CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=n. > > The really strange thing is that I have bisected this down to 326e96b9 > ("printk: revert ktime_get() timestamps"), and verified that if revert > this one patch on top of my current git tree, then the kernel boots > fine with CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y. The strange thing is that I have also > checked that the real v2.6.24 kernel boots fine on this system, and as > far as I can tell, 2.6.24 didn't have the commit that 326e96b9 reverts > (19ef9309), so there is some interaction with another patch that made > 19ef9309 necessary on my system. > > Any good idea how to debug this, given that the broken kernels don't > give any output at all? The kernel now derefernces per-cpu variables very early, essentially in the very first printk() (via printk()'s call to cpu_clock()). This bit me on sparc64 because of how I do the per-cpu address formation. If I booted on a non-zero cpuid things would explode. You might be hitting something similar. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/