On 13/08/2026 09:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2026 at 06:46:30PM +0800, Jiafei Pan wrote: >> Add compatible string "fsl,imx-rproc-psci" for i.MX Cortex-A Core's >> remoteproc support. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiafei Pan <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> Changes in v4: >> - Updated description to describe the hardware instead of the binding >> - Changed compatible to SoC-specific "fsl,imx93-rproc-psci" with >> generic fallback "fsl,imx-rproc-psci" >> - Fixed example node name from "remoteproc-ca55-1" to "remoteproc" > > You need to start using b4 to send patches or send them correctly... Why > is this response to some other thread? > >> >> --- >> .../remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc-psci.yaml | 54 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc-psci.yaml >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc-psci.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc-psci.yaml >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..7d0d0da383a2 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc-psci.yaml >> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) >> +%YAML 1.2 >> +--- >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/fsl,imx-rproc-psci.yaml# >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# >> + >> +title: NXP i.MX Cortex-A Core Remote Processor via PSCI >> + >> +maintainers: >> + - Jiafei Pan <[email protected]> >> + >> +description: >> + NXP i.MX SoCs integrate multiple Cortex-A cores. On certain i.MX >> + platforms, one or more of these cores can be offloaded to run RTOS >> + or bare-metal firmware as a remote processor, while the remaining >> + cores run Linux. The cores are powered on and off via PSCI (Power >> + State Coordination Interface) CPU_ON/CPU_OFF calls to the firmware. >> + >> +properties: >> + compatible: >> + items: >> + - enum: >> + - fsl,imx93-ca55-rproc >> + - const: fsl,imx-rproc-psci > > Hm? So you just ignored the feedback? >
Ah, you just did not bother even to wait for my reply! After three months after my review, you send reply to my comments and IMMEDIATELY you send v4 without waiting for me to address them. Srsly, if you have three months, then don't you think I deserve more than 1 hour? NAK Best regards, Krzysztof
