On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 11:06:34 +0800 Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> > It may be better to split the series and send this patch to net,
> > the netdev CI has a netdevsim test for the prog offload, would be
> > good to run that.
>
> Though for now bpf_xdp_link_update() already does:
>
> if (old_prog->type != new_prog->type ||
> old_prog->expected_attach_type != new_prog->expected_attach_type) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> so the other checks can't be triggered on the update path even without
> them in dev_xdp_install().
>
> So I'm thinking this patch works as a standalone fix (good for
> backport), and the cleanup goes as a followup (if necessary)?
Just do it right please. Feels like we are promised a follow up to
every single patch these days :/
