On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Quim K Holland wrote:

> I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why
> the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been
> applied. [...]

> -               return_ok = bh->b_reqnext;
> +               return_fail = bh->b_reqnext;

oops - i do have it in my tree, somehow it escaped.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to