On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Quim K Holland wrote: > I've been following the recent 2.4.1-pre series and am wondering why > the following one-liner (obviously correct) patch has not been > applied. [...] > - return_ok = bh->b_reqnext; > + return_fail = bh->b_reqnext; oops - i do have it in my tree, somehow it escaped. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Desk check of raid5.c patch from mtew@cds.duke.edu? Quim K Holland
- Ingo Molnar