On Feb. 11, 2008, 20:42 +0200, Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:58:08PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote: >> OK, but the return type doesn't have to be in the patched line, it could be >> in >> a synchronization line or even missing if the function has a long multi-line >> argument >> list. > > Ok, I guess thats fair criticism. Could you check out the current > checkpatch-next (0.14-8-g3737366 or later -9, -10 etc), and see if > that works. It seems to on the simple examples you sent me :).
Confirmed with 0.14-8-g3737366. Thanks! Benny Oh, and I really liked the fact that you print the patch file name in the summary line of each patch checked rather than "Your patch" :) > > Thanks. > > -apw -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
