The description of the interrupt routing doesn't match the (nice) diagram. Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nick. --- a/Documentation/i386/IO-APIC.txt 2007-10-10 06:31:38.000000000 +1000 +++ b/Documentation/i386/IO-APIC.txt 2008-02-12 11:57:08.000000000 +1100 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ These INTA-D PCI IRQs are always 'local to the card', their real meaning depends on which slot they are in. If you look at the daisy chaining diagram, -a card in slot4, issuing INTA IRQ, it will end up as a signal on PIRQ2 of +a card in slot4, issuing INTA IRQ, it will end up as a signal on PIRQ4 of the PCI chipset. Most cards issue INTA, this creates optimal distribution between the PIRQ lines. (distributing IRQ sources properly is not a necessity, PCI IRQs can be shared at will, but it's a good for performance -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
