On 2026/7/22 12:21, Feng Jiang wrote:
Add a test that checks R0-R5 are preserved across
arch_bpf_timed_may_goto() calls.

Use bpf_get_prandom_u32() to avoid the verifier removing the checks
via DCE.

Suggested-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Feng Jiang <[email protected]>
---
  .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_may_goto_1.c      | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_may_goto_1.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_may_goto_1.c
index 4bdf4256a41e..98d59108d097 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_may_goto_1.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_may_goto_1.c
@@ -106,4 +106,61 @@ __naked void may_goto_batch_2(void)
        : __clobber_all);
  }
+/*
+ * Use bpf_get_prandom_u32() to prevent DCE from removing the checks.
+ * retval: 0=all ok, 1-6=R0-R5 clobbered.
+ */
+SEC("raw_tp")
+__description("timed may_goto preserves R0-R5")
+__arch_x86_64
+__arch_arm64
+__arch_riscv64
+__success
+__retval(0)

__arch_s390x is also supported timed_may_goto

+__naked void timed_may_goto_preserves_regs(void)
+{
+       asm volatile (
+       "call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32];"
+       "r6 = r0;"
+       "r0 = 0x1111;"
+       "r0 += r6;"
+       "r1 = 0x2222;"
+       "r1 += r6;"
+       "r2 = 0x3333;"
+       "r2 += r6;"
+       "r3 = 0x4444;"
+       "r3 += r6;"
+       "r4 = 0x5555;"
+       "r4 += r6;"
+       "r5 = 0x6666;"
+       "r5 += r6;"
+       ".8byte %[may_goto];"
+       ".8byte %[loop];"
+       "r0 -= r6;"
+       "r1 -= r6;"
+       "r2 -= r6;"
+       "r3 -= r6;"
+       "r4 -= r6;"
+       "r5 -= r6;"
+       "if r0 != 0x1111 goto 1f;"
+       "if r1 != 0x2222 goto 2f;"
+       "if r2 != 0x3333 goto 3f;"
+       "if r3 != 0x4444 goto 4f;"
+       "if r4 != 0x5555 goto 5f;"
+       "if r5 != 0x6666 goto 6f;"
+       "r0 = 0;"
+       "exit;"
+       "1: r0 = 1; exit;"
+       "2: r0 = 2; exit;"
+       "3: r0 = 3; exit;"
+       "4: r0 = 4; exit;"
+       "5: r0 = 5; exit;"
+       "6: r0 = 6; exit;"
+       :
+       : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32),
+         __imm_insn(may_goto, BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_JCOND, 0, 0, 1, 0)),
+         __imm_insn(loop, BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_JA, 0, 0, -2, 0))
+       : __clobber_all);
+}
+
  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";


not work, pls take a look

root@(none):/mnt/bpf# ./test_progs -v -a verifier_may_goto_1
bpf_testmod.ko is already unloaded.
Loading bpf_testmod.ko...
[   26.123549] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel.
[ 26.127885] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel
Successfully loaded bpf_testmod.ko.
tester_init:PASS:tester_log_buf 0 nsec
process_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
process_subtest:PASS:specs_alloc 0 nsec
run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
run_subtest:PASS:unexpected_load_failure 0 nsec
VERIFIER LOG:
=============
processed 43 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 4 peak_states 5 mark_read 0
=============
do_prog_test_run:FAIL:1114 FAIL: Unexpected bpf_prog_test_run error: 22 (Invalid argument) #660/1 verifier_may_goto_1/timed may_goto preserves R0-R5:FAIL
#660     verifier_may_goto_1:FAIL
Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED
Successfully unloaded bpf_testmod.ko.

Reply via email to