On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 04:52:34PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 09:59:35PM -0700, Qiang Yu wrote:
> > This series adds a common clkref_en implementation and converts glymur
> > and mahua to use it, along with the related binding and DTS updates.
> > 
> > The PCIe clkref clocks on Glymur and Mahua gate the QREF block which
> > provides reference clocks to the PCIe PHYs. QREF requires LDO supplies
> > and a reference voltage from the refgen block to operate. The refgen
> > block itself requires vdda-refgen_0p9 and vdda-refgen_1p2 LDOs to
> > function.
> > 
> > Previously, these QREF votes were done in PHY drivers. In earlier
> > discussion [1], the feedback was that this is the wrong ownership point:
> > those supplies are for the QREF controlled by clkref registers, not for
> > the PHY directly. Based on that feedback, this series keeps the
> > regulator handling with the clkref control path.
> > 
> > Another reason for this series is reuse. clkref_en registers may live in
> > different blocks across platforms (for example TCSR on Glymur, TLMM on
> > SM8750 [2]), while the behavior is the same. The common helper lets each
> > driver provide simple descriptors (name, offset, optional supplies) and
> > reuse shared registration and runtime logic.
> > 
> > Glymur and Mahua share the same QREF TX/RPT/RX component naming but
> > have different PCIe QREF topologies. Both are handled in tcsrcc-glymur.c
> > via match_data to select the correct descriptor table per compatible.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> > [2] 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Changes in v9:
> >   - Add reviewed-by tags, no code change.
> >   - Link to v8: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Changes in v8:
> >   - Define refs with __counted_by(num_refs) and make provider a single 
> > allocation
> >   - Use mahua_tcsr_tx1_rpt012_rx2_regulators for PCIe6.
> >   - Link to v7: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Changes in v7:
> >   - Define compatible as an enum and add the per-compatible allOf/if/then 
> > block upfront for glymur. Reword commit msg for patch1
> >   - Drop Krzysztof's Reviewed-by since the patch changed substantially from 
> > what he reviewed.
> >   - Added a comment noting that on Mahua the REFGEN4 block is supplied by 
> > the vdda-refgen3-* regulators, and mentioned this in the commit message for 
> > patch2.
> >   - Change the descriptor array to an array of pointers (const struct 
> > qcom_clk_ref_desc * const *). Skip unpopulated indices with if (!desc)
> >   - Convert tcsr_cc_glymur_clk_descs[] and tcsr_cc_mahua_clk_descs[] to a 
> > pointer array.
> >   - Add regulator lists for clkref_en on Mahua.
> >   - Null-check device_get_match_data() result in probe.
> >   - Add rx0 regulator in mahua tcsr node
> >   - Squashed the former patch 8 (switch pcie5_phy ref clock to 
> > RPMH_CXO_CLK) into patch7, so Mahua PCIe probes at every commit.
> >  - Link to v6: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Split dt-bindings patch into two: one to move glymur-tcsr to its own
> >   binding file, and one to add mahua support
> > - Use regmap_set_bits()/regmap_clear_bits() instead of regmap_update_bits()
> >   in clk-ref.c
> > - Move clk_init_data from struct qcom_clk_ref to a stack variable in
> >   qcom_clk_ref_register()
> > - Add Co-developed-by/Reviewed-by tags from Konrad Dybcio
> > - Add missing regulator supplies for EDP and USB clkref_en on glymur
> > - Link to v5: 
> > https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
> > 
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Return 0 if regmap_read fail
> > - Add a separate file for glymur-tcsr and mahua-tcsr
> > - Link to v4: 
> > https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
> > 
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Add mahua QREF support (binding, driver, DTS) to avoid dtb check error
> > - Override pcie5_phy ref clock to RPMH_CXO_CLK on mahua since
> >   TCSR_PCIE_1_CLKREF_EN is not available
> > - Rename regulator arrays to topology-based names and merge duplicates
> > - Remove else: false blocks from binding
> > - Sort supply properties alphabetically in binding and DTS
> > - Link to v3: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Fix dtb check error: allOf:0: 'then' is a dependency of 'if'.
> > - Link to v2: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > - RFC tag dropped
> > - Changed back to additionalProperties: false
> > - Moved all Glymur supply properties into top-level properties so they are 
> > explicitly defined.
> > - Link to v1: 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Qiang Yu (7):
> >       dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Move glymur TCSR to own binding
> >       dt-bindings: clock: qcom,glymur-tcsr: Add mahua support
> >       clk: qcom: Add generic clkref_en support
> >       clk: qcom: tcsrcc-glymur: Add regulator supplies and migrate to 
> > clk_ref helper
> >       clk: qcom: tcsrcc-glymur: Add Mahua QREF regulator support
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Add QREF regulator supplies to TCSR
> >       arm64: dts: qcom: mahua: Add QREF regulator supplies to TCSR
> > 
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,glymur-tcsr.yaml           | 146 +++++++
> >  .../bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-tcsr.yaml           |   2 -
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts            |  20 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/mahua-crd.dts             |  16 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/mahua.dtsi                |  13 +
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile                          |   1 +
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-ref.c                         | 205 +++++++++
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/tcsrcc-glymur.c                   | 471 
> > +++++++++++----------
> >  include/linux/clk/qcom.h                           |  67 +++
> >  9 files changed, 704 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 3da905eb243cad56200f09bb7eaa060537aed0cc
> 
> I was hoping to apply this series, but I don't have this commit and
> patch 4 ("migrate to clk_ref helper") doesn't apply to my tree.
> 
> What did you base this on? Why don't you test your changes on latest
> mainline or linux-next?
> 
> Please rebase and test on a relevant branch.

Sorry for the trouble, I based v9 on next-20260713, but I forgot to
drop this patch
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/,
which is a dependency for another series I'm working on, before
running b4 prep -n.

I can git am v9 cleanly onto latest linux-next (next-20260717), but
I'm not sure if that's the branch you apply against. Could you
confirm which branch I should rebase onto, so I don't run into the
same issue again?

- Qiang Yu

Reply via email to