* Juergen Gross <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02.07.26 12:07, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Note that the individual patches are IMO significantly easier to review > > > > through the actual 32-bit => 64-bit variable assignment changes done > > > > in isolation (which sometimes include minor cleanups), while > > > > the Coccinelle semantic patch: > > > > > > > > { a(b,c) => c = a(b) } > > > > > > > > which changes both the function signature and the order of terms as > > > > well, is just a single add-on treewide patch. > > > > > > Is the plan for subsystem maintainers to pick up the relevant patches, > > > and then do the treewide change one release cycle later? > > > > I'll try to keep the patches in a single tree (tip:x86/msr) > > in the hope of not prolonging the pain two cycles - but it's > > of course fine for maintainers to pick up the patches too > > (most of them are standalone), we'll sort it all out in the end. > > Ingo, would you be fine with me posting patch updates just as replies to the > original patch emails? This would speed things up, as I wouldn't need to wait > for more review input of all the patches before sending out new versions. Sure, that works for me too. I've picked up a couple of -v2 patches already. Thanks, Ingo
