On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 06:03:09PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> The RCU tasks trace has been reimplemented by 'commit c27cea4416a3
> ("rcu: Re-implement RCU Tasks Trace in terms of SRCU-fast")', the
> rcu_tasks structure's->n_ipis_fails is no longer used, this commit
> therefore remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <[email protected]>

I have queued both for review and testing, thank you!

This patch produced the expected result in my initial tests.  However,
for the second patch, I used this command to force a stall:

tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 15 --configs 
"TASKS01 TASKS02 TASKS03 RUDE01" --bootargs "rcutorture.stall_cpu=660" 
--trust-make

Except I got vanilla RCU CPU stall warnings, but not RCU Tasks nor
RCU Tasks Rude stall warnings.  And not even the "grace period number"
pre-stall message.  Probably because I am forgetting something.  But what
did you do to test your change?

                                                        Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index f4da5fad70f5..7f7d1e636217 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
>   * @gp_start: Most recent grace-period start in jiffies.
>   * @tasks_gp_seq: Number of grace periods completed since boot in upper bits.
>   * @n_ipis: Number of IPIs sent to encourage grace periods to end.
> - * @n_ipis_fails: Number of IPI-send failures.
>   * @kthread_ptr: This flavor's grace-period/callback-invocation kthread.
>   * @lazy_jiffies: Number of jiffies to allow callbacks to be lazy.
>   * @pregp_func: This flavor's pre-grace-period function (optional).
> @@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
>       unsigned long gp_start;
>       unsigned long tasks_gp_seq;
>       unsigned long n_ipis;
> -     unsigned long n_ipis_fails;
>       struct task_struct *kthread_ptr;
>       unsigned long lazy_jiffies;
>       rcu_tasks_gp_func_t gp_func;
> @@ -735,12 +733,12 @@ static void show_rcu_tasks_generic_gp_kthread(struct 
> rcu_tasks *rtp, char *s)
>               if (havecbs && haveurgent && haveurgentcbs)
>                       break;
>       }
> -     pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu/%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
> +     pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
>               rtp->kname,
>               tasks_gp_state_getname(rtp), data_race(rtp->gp_state),
>               jiffies - data_race(rtp->gp_jiffies),
>               data_race(rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq)),
> -             data_race(rtp->n_ipis_fails), data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
> +             data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
>               ".k"[!!data_race(rtp->kthread_ptr)],
>               ".C"[havecbs],
>               ".u"[haveurgent],
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to