On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 09:55:49AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: > > > On 6/9/26 8:51 PM, Richard Cheng wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 04:19:47PM +0800, Dave Jiang wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 5/23/26 2:50 AM, Anisa Su wrote: > >>> From: Ira Weiny <[email protected]> > > <-- snip --> > > >>> diff --git a/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym b/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym > >>> index ed4429f..258bdd3 100644 > >>> --- a/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym > >>> +++ b/cxl/lib/libcxl.sym > >>> @@ -294,6 +294,10 @@ global: > >>> cxl_memdev_get_fwctl; > >>> cxl_fwctl_get_major; > >>> cxl_fwctl_get_minor; > >>> + cxl_memdev_get_dynamic_ram_a_size; > >>> + cxl_memdev_get_dynamic_ram_a_qos_class; > >>> + cxl_decoder_is_dynamic_ram_a_capable; > >>> + cxl_decoder_create_dynamic_ram_a_region; > >>> } LIBECXL_8; > >>> > >>> LIBCXL_10 { > > > > Shouldn't new exported symbols go in a fresh top-level node ? > > Something like LIBCXL_12 ? please note that Patch 4 has the same > > issue. > > > > Please let me know if I'm wrong or misunderstand anything. > You are correct. These need to be moved to a new block for a new release.
Thank you for finding this! It's gone into LIBCXL_13 after rebasing on the latest pending branch. Thanks, Anisa
