Hi;
10 Şub 2008 Paz tarihinde, Linus Torvalds şunları yazmıştı:
>
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - while (dev = device_find_child(&conn->dev, NULL, __match_tty)) {
> > > > + while ((dev = device_find_child(&conn->dev, NULL, __match_tty))
> > > > != NULL) {
> > > >
> > > Why do you need '!= NULL'?
> >
> > I thought its more readable than
> >
> > while ((dev = device_find_child(&conn->dev, NULL, __match_tty))) {
>
> Yes indeed. I hate the idiotic "double parenthesis without any meaning".
> I'd much rather see "((..) != NULL)" than "((..))", because the latter is
> totally meaningless semantically (although gcc gives it semantics).
But you still not merged this one :), is there any problem exists or would you
prefer this comes from with a subsystem tree (which means i'm doing wrong thing
with sending these trivial patches to you)?
Cheers
--
S.Çağlar Onur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/
Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
