* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i dont think so. Which ones do you mean? I just reviewed them and > > they are either already done, or moot (for kgdb complications that i > > objected to and removed from this kgdb-x86 tree). > > The one I noticed quickly is the __ASSEMBLY__ removal from > asm-x86/kgdb.h. [...]
people might want to experiment with early debug code as well and include asm-x86/kgdb.h in assembly files. So i kept that, it's sensible. > [...] I haven't looked at the serial bits because I don't think I'm > qualified to comment on those, but I'm also not seeing any replies to > any of his patches. Especially the comments on the arch interface > seem like something that should be acted upon to me. yeah - i also noticed that the serial subsystem is marked "orphaned" in the MAINTAINERS file: 8250/16?50 (AND CLONE UARTS) SERIAL DRIVER L: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://serial.sourceforge.net S: Orphan and compared to the raw-lowlevel-serial-driver hackery that KGDB used to do this is a big step forward. Note that it's all dependent on CONFIG_KGDB. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
