Hi Nikolay, > For the MDB to have a dynamic reservation entry means someone must've added > it, > these are not dynamically learned, so you can just as well build the table > in a more appropriate place which can tag or filter the packet.
Fair enough, also a reasonable argument :) Without 802.1Q Dynamic Reservation Entries having first-class support in the MDB, I don’t think there’s an abstraction that also maps well to the mv88e6xxx. I’ll keep thinking about it, but for now this had probably best remain a local patch. [1] Thanks for taking the time to give feedback, I learned a lot. Cheers, Luke [1] https://github.com/PADL/linux/tree/b4/mv88e6xxx-8021qat-mqprio
