On 3/5/2026 11:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/03/2026 01:43, Kerigan Creighton wrote:
>> WCN3610 has the same regulator requirements as
>> WCN3620, so in qcom_wcnss_iris, we can use wcn3620_data.
>>
>> A separate compatible is needed for WCN3610 because the
>> wcn36xx driver uses it for chip-specific configuration.
>> Specifically, it sets BTC (Bluetooth Coexistence) CFGs,
>> disables ENABLE_DYNAMIC_RA_START_RATE, and disables
>> STA_POWERSAVE for this specific chip for stable
>> functionality.
> 
> This goes to the binding description where you describe the hardware,
> how I asked.
> 
> Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
> process (neither too early nor over the limit):
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597
This series is sitting in my patchwork queue.
Based upon Krzysztof's comments there should be a v4 that moves some
descriptive text from 2/3 to 1/3.

Bjorn: Once v4 lands, do you want to take this series or should I?
(Need to know if I should wait for ACK of 2/3 or give ACK for 3/3).

/jeff

Reply via email to