On Sat, 16 May 2026 14:59:44 -0700 Roman Gushchin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On May 16, 2026, at 2:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I find it opposite: clogging commits with useless information, because > > some arbitrary and completely closed-source tool did analysis means > > nothing to me one year later when I look at the commit in the Git history. > > This is simple not true: Sashiko is fully open-source, under Apache 2.0 > license > and the code belongs to LF. > Yes, the instance behind sashiko.dev is using > Gemini 3.1 Pro LLM, which is not open-source, but it’s not a fundamental > limitation - > Sashiko is supporting various LLMs, including open models - it’s just a > practical > choice: to my knowledge the quality of open models is not on par with > frontier closed > models I would very much prefer using an open source LLM, even if not in pair with latest paid models. > and it would require a non-trivial amount of hardware and infrastructure to > run > an open model at the required scale. IMHO the best would be to have them running on some infra that would accept open source models (*). If there aren't enough resources to have our own infra, there are offers out there which allows running open source models like https://ollama.com/pricing (I never used myself). (*) For instance, Qwen3.6 is brand new and licensed under apache-2.0. Not bad on my tests running it locally. Thanks, Mauro
